Wednesday 24th October 2018

Topics
No items found.
Ilaria Valtimora
October 24, 2018
This content is from our archive. Some formatting or links may be broken.
This content is from our archive. Some formatting or links may be broken.
Wednesday 24th October 2018

Wind Watch

Chatham Partners' Felix Fischer on the future of German offshore and the step away from subsidies
By Frances Salter

Which wind projects are Chatham Partners currently involved with?

As you may have seen in the press, we are on Ørsted’s panel of legal advisors in Germany. And we are supporting another large developer in his project execution, in particular with contracts and claims management.
We advise some larger-scale onshore wind project developments and a few commissioned projects, both on- and offshore across Germany on legal matters of operations. And what I am particularly happy about is that we recently contributed our first advice to one of the projects in Taiwan.

That’s quite a diverse spread in terms of geographical location. Where do you see the most interesting marketing opportunities for wind?

It depends whether we are talking about onshore or offshore. In terms of offshore, my perception is that the US is a very interesting market at the moment – you can tell from Ørsted’s acquisition of Deepwater Wind that they are increasing their footprint in that market. A number of projects are making large progress and have been awarded power purchase agreements [PPAs] by state governments, like the 800MW Vineyard project.

I think that market is very interesting because, though you can say what you want about the current government, it is still an established industrial market where it is possible to comfortably set up the logistics of a project. This means that, although it is geographically further away, it is still a quite familiar environment for European developers.

There are also opportunities in markets further afield. Look at Taiwan, India and Korea – to name a few. What you see on the ground is that the complexities are obviously slightly bigger than in more established markets. This concerns political processes, supply-chains and simply culture.

For onshore wind, it is my perception that the market has become truly global. We see clients invest in most fairly stable economies across Asia, North and South America and Europe. After all, investors have to consider how large your appetite is for return expectations, and that decides to what extent your interest lies in more established or emerging markets. On the other hand, some players simply have a global strategy.

What do you see as being the biggest legal challenges for European wind?

To be honest, I must say that we’ve overcome a lot of the challenges. Now the main regulatory issues are problems of grid congestion and environmental permitting.

In my view, few countries so far provide a viable regulatory framework to finally break-through on storage technologies or power-to-X solutions. To improve this would be important in order to allow for a faster and efficient build-out.

The step from subsidised to purely marketed electricity production is large from a financing perspective. We are still experimenting with that. It is more common in Scandinavia and the UK than it is in Germany, so PPAs with volatile electricity are still something we are learning how to address properly, both economically and contractually.

On the other hand, everybody always talks about the PPA market as though it was a new thing – but we have known and worked with PPAs for decades. There still are many parallels to the days of nuclear and fossil power plants. So that is no revolution from my perspective – at least in the legal sense, it is not as complicated as many people claim. Economically, one may take a different view, in particular considering the range of electricity price forecasts.

What do you think the next ten years will look like for wind in Germany?

The government is planning to auction an additional 4GW of onshore wind capacity so that is good news. Also, the prices have increased in the last auction. Overall, I think onshore wind might over this period become the cheapest electricity we have, especially with further scaling.

Right now, offshore wind is a bit problematic because our grid enhancements and expansions have not kept pace. But I think with more technology coming to the market, that helps to balance the grids and some infrastructure measures – this natural boundary to offshore wind – will fall. We will see more capacity being realised than most people expect at this point.

And finally, what do you think the impact of Brexit will be for wind in the UK?

The fundamental logic of power production will stay the same. But I do not know what the impact might be on the political agenda of the UK.

It is possible there will be less foreign investors willing or able to invest in the UK. But that will not be a problem as long as there is so much capital in the market. If at any point in time we see a general downturn with less money in the market, then it could hit the UK harder as investors would have to diversify their portfolios.

Want to hear more from Felix? He'll speaking at Financing Wind Europe conference on 1st November, where Chatham Partners is an official supporting organisation. Book your place.

Wind Watch

Chatham Partners' Felix Fischer on the future of German offshore and the step away from subsidies
By Frances Salter

Which wind projects are Chatham Partners currently involved with?

As you may have seen in the press, we are on Ørsted’s panel of legal advisors in Germany. And we are supporting another large developer in his project execution, in particular with contracts and claims management.
We advise some larger-scale onshore wind project developments and a few commissioned projects, both on- and offshore across Germany on legal matters of operations. And what I am particularly happy about is that we recently contributed our first advice to one of the projects in Taiwan.

That’s quite a diverse spread in terms of geographical location. Where do you see the most interesting marketing opportunities for wind?

It depends whether we are talking about onshore or offshore. In terms of offshore, my perception is that the US is a very interesting market at the moment – you can tell from Ørsted’s acquisition of Deepwater Wind that they are increasing their footprint in that market. A number of projects are making large progress and have been awarded power purchase agreements [PPAs] by state governments, like the 800MW Vineyard project.

I think that market is very interesting because, though you can say what you want about the current government, it is still an established industrial market where it is possible to comfortably set up the logistics of a project. This means that, although it is geographically further away, it is still a quite familiar environment for European developers.

There are also opportunities in markets further afield. Look at Taiwan, India and Korea – to name a few. What you see on the ground is that the complexities are obviously slightly bigger than in more established markets. This concerns political processes, supply-chains and simply culture.

For onshore wind, it is my perception that the market has become truly global. We see clients invest in most fairly stable economies across Asia, North and South America and Europe. After all, investors have to consider how large your appetite is for return expectations, and that decides to what extent your interest lies in more established or emerging markets. On the other hand, some players simply have a global strategy.

What do you see as being the biggest legal challenges for European wind?

To be honest, I must say that we’ve overcome a lot of the challenges. Now the main regulatory issues are problems of grid congestion and environmental permitting.

In my view, few countries so far provide a viable regulatory framework to finally break-through on storage technologies or power-to-X solutions. To improve this would be important in order to allow for a faster and efficient build-out.

The step from subsidised to purely marketed electricity production is large from a financing perspective. We are still experimenting with that. It is more common in Scandinavia and the UK than it is in Germany, so PPAs with volatile electricity are still something we are learning how to address properly, both economically and contractually.

On the other hand, everybody always talks about the PPA market as though it was a new thing – but we have known and worked with PPAs for decades. There still are many parallels to the days of nuclear and fossil power plants. So that is no revolution from my perspective – at least in the legal sense, it is not as complicated as many people claim. Economically, one may take a different view, in particular considering the range of electricity price forecasts.

What do you think the next ten years will look like for wind in Germany?

The government is planning to auction an additional 4GW of onshore wind capacity so that is good news. Also, the prices have increased in the last auction. Overall, I think onshore wind might over this period become the cheapest electricity we have, especially with further scaling.

Right now, offshore wind is a bit problematic because our grid enhancements and expansions have not kept pace. But I think with more technology coming to the market, that helps to balance the grids and some infrastructure measures – this natural boundary to offshore wind – will fall. We will see more capacity being realised than most people expect at this point.

And finally, what do you think the impact of Brexit will be for wind in the UK?

The fundamental logic of power production will stay the same. But I do not know what the impact might be on the political agenda of the UK.

It is possible there will be less foreign investors willing or able to invest in the UK. But that will not be a problem as long as there is so much capital in the market. If at any point in time we see a general downturn with less money in the market, then it could hit the UK harder as investors would have to diversify their portfolios.

Want to hear more from Felix? He'll speaking at Financing Wind Europe conference on 1st November, where Chatham Partners is an official supporting organisation. Book your place.

Wind Watch

Chatham Partners' Felix Fischer on the future of German offshore and the step away from subsidies
By Frances Salter

Which wind projects are Chatham Partners currently involved with?

As you may have seen in the press, we are on Ørsted’s panel of legal advisors in Germany. And we are supporting another large developer in his project execution, in particular with contracts and claims management.
We advise some larger-scale onshore wind project developments and a few commissioned projects, both on- and offshore across Germany on legal matters of operations. And what I am particularly happy about is that we recently contributed our first advice to one of the projects in Taiwan.

That’s quite a diverse spread in terms of geographical location. Where do you see the most interesting marketing opportunities for wind?

It depends whether we are talking about onshore or offshore. In terms of offshore, my perception is that the US is a very interesting market at the moment – you can tell from Ørsted’s acquisition of Deepwater Wind that they are increasing their footprint in that market. A number of projects are making large progress and have been awarded power purchase agreements [PPAs] by state governments, like the 800MW Vineyard project.

I think that market is very interesting because, though you can say what you want about the current government, it is still an established industrial market where it is possible to comfortably set up the logistics of a project. This means that, although it is geographically further away, it is still a quite familiar environment for European developers.

There are also opportunities in markets further afield. Look at Taiwan, India and Korea – to name a few. What you see on the ground is that the complexities are obviously slightly bigger than in more established markets. This concerns political processes, supply-chains and simply culture.

For onshore wind, it is my perception that the market has become truly global. We see clients invest in most fairly stable economies across Asia, North and South America and Europe. After all, investors have to consider how large your appetite is for return expectations, and that decides to what extent your interest lies in more established or emerging markets. On the other hand, some players simply have a global strategy.

What do you see as being the biggest legal challenges for European wind?

To be honest, I must say that we’ve overcome a lot of the challenges. Now the main regulatory issues are problems of grid congestion and environmental permitting.

In my view, few countries so far provide a viable regulatory framework to finally break-through on storage technologies or power-to-X solutions. To improve this would be important in order to allow for a faster and efficient build-out.

The step from subsidised to purely marketed electricity production is large from a financing perspective. We are still experimenting with that. It is more common in Scandinavia and the UK than it is in Germany, so PPAs with volatile electricity are still something we are learning how to address properly, both economically and contractually.

On the other hand, everybody always talks about the PPA market as though it was a new thing – but we have known and worked with PPAs for decades. There still are many parallels to the days of nuclear and fossil power plants. So that is no revolution from my perspective – at least in the legal sense, it is not as complicated as many people claim. Economically, one may take a different view, in particular considering the range of electricity price forecasts.

What do you think the next ten years will look like for wind in Germany?

The government is planning to auction an additional 4GW of onshore wind capacity so that is good news. Also, the prices have increased in the last auction. Overall, I think onshore wind might over this period become the cheapest electricity we have, especially with further scaling.

Right now, offshore wind is a bit problematic because our grid enhancements and expansions have not kept pace. But I think with more technology coming to the market, that helps to balance the grids and some infrastructure measures – this natural boundary to offshore wind – will fall. We will see more capacity being realised than most people expect at this point.

And finally, what do you think the impact of Brexit will be for wind in the UK?

The fundamental logic of power production will stay the same. But I do not know what the impact might be on the political agenda of the UK.

It is possible there will be less foreign investors willing or able to invest in the UK. But that will not be a problem as long as there is so much capital in the market. If at any point in time we see a general downturn with less money in the market, then it could hit the UK harder as investors would have to diversify their portfolios.

Want to hear more from Felix? He'll speaking at Financing Wind Europe conference on 1st November, where Chatham Partners is an official supporting organisation. Book your place.

Wind Watch

Chatham Partners' Felix Fischer on the future of German offshore and the step away from subsidies
By Frances Salter

Which wind projects are Chatham Partners currently involved with?

As you may have seen in the press, we are on Ørsted’s panel of legal advisors in Germany. And we are supporting another large developer in his project execution, in particular with contracts and claims management.
We advise some larger-scale onshore wind project developments and a few commissioned projects, both on- and offshore across Germany on legal matters of operations. And what I am particularly happy about is that we recently contributed our first advice to one of the projects in Taiwan.

That’s quite a diverse spread in terms of geographical location. Where do you see the most interesting marketing opportunities for wind?

It depends whether we are talking about onshore or offshore. In terms of offshore, my perception is that the US is a very interesting market at the moment – you can tell from Ørsted’s acquisition of Deepwater Wind that they are increasing their footprint in that market. A number of projects are making large progress and have been awarded power purchase agreements [PPAs] by state governments, like the 800MW Vineyard project.

I think that market is very interesting because, though you can say what you want about the current government, it is still an established industrial market where it is possible to comfortably set up the logistics of a project. This means that, although it is geographically further away, it is still a quite familiar environment for European developers.

There are also opportunities in markets further afield. Look at Taiwan, India and Korea – to name a few. What you see on the ground is that the complexities are obviously slightly bigger than in more established markets. This concerns political processes, supply-chains and simply culture.

For onshore wind, it is my perception that the market has become truly global. We see clients invest in most fairly stable economies across Asia, North and South America and Europe. After all, investors have to consider how large your appetite is for return expectations, and that decides to what extent your interest lies in more established or emerging markets. On the other hand, some players simply have a global strategy.

What do you see as being the biggest legal challenges for European wind?

To be honest, I must say that we’ve overcome a lot of the challenges. Now the main regulatory issues are problems of grid congestion and environmental permitting.

In my view, few countries so far provide a viable regulatory framework to finally break-through on storage technologies or power-to-X solutions. To improve this would be important in order to allow for a faster and efficient build-out.

The step from subsidised to purely marketed electricity production is large from a financing perspective. We are still experimenting with that. It is more common in Scandinavia and the UK than it is in Germany, so PPAs with volatile electricity are still something we are learning how to address properly, both economically and contractually.

On the other hand, everybody always talks about the PPA market as though it was a new thing – but we have known and worked with PPAs for decades. There still are many parallels to the days of nuclear and fossil power plants. So that is no revolution from my perspective – at least in the legal sense, it is not as complicated as many people claim. Economically, one may take a different view, in particular considering the range of electricity price forecasts.

What do you think the next ten years will look like for wind in Germany?

The government is planning to auction an additional 4GW of onshore wind capacity so that is good news. Also, the prices have increased in the last auction. Overall, I think onshore wind might over this period become the cheapest electricity we have, especially with further scaling.

Right now, offshore wind is a bit problematic because our grid enhancements and expansions have not kept pace. But I think with more technology coming to the market, that helps to balance the grids and some infrastructure measures – this natural boundary to offshore wind – will fall. We will see more capacity being realised than most people expect at this point.

And finally, what do you think the impact of Brexit will be for wind in the UK?

The fundamental logic of power production will stay the same. But I do not know what the impact might be on the political agenda of the UK.

It is possible there will be less foreign investors willing or able to invest in the UK. But that will not be a problem as long as there is so much capital in the market. If at any point in time we see a general downturn with less money in the market, then it could hit the UK harder as investors would have to diversify their portfolios.

Want to hear more from Felix? He'll speaking at Financing Wind Europe conference on 1st November, where Chatham Partners is an official supporting organisation. Book your place.

Wind Watch

Chatham Partners' Felix Fischer on the future of German offshore and the step away from subsidies
By Frances Salter

Which wind projects are Chatham Partners currently involved with?

As you may have seen in the press, we are on Ørsted’s panel of legal advisors in Germany. And we are supporting another large developer in his project execution, in particular with contracts and claims management.
We advise some larger-scale onshore wind project developments and a few commissioned projects, both on- and offshore across Germany on legal matters of operations. And what I am particularly happy about is that we recently contributed our first advice to one of the projects in Taiwan.

That’s quite a diverse spread in terms of geographical location. Where do you see the most interesting marketing opportunities for wind?

It depends whether we are talking about onshore or offshore. In terms of offshore, my perception is that the US is a very interesting market at the moment – you can tell from Ørsted’s acquisition of Deepwater Wind that they are increasing their footprint in that market. A number of projects are making large progress and have been awarded power purchase agreements [PPAs] by state governments, like the 800MW Vineyard project.

I think that market is very interesting because, though you can say what you want about the current government, it is still an established industrial market where it is possible to comfortably set up the logistics of a project. This means that, although it is geographically further away, it is still a quite familiar environment for European developers.

There are also opportunities in markets further afield. Look at Taiwan, India and Korea – to name a few. What you see on the ground is that the complexities are obviously slightly bigger than in more established markets. This concerns political processes, supply-chains and simply culture.

For onshore wind, it is my perception that the market has become truly global. We see clients invest in most fairly stable economies across Asia, North and South America and Europe. After all, investors have to consider how large your appetite is for return expectations, and that decides to what extent your interest lies in more established or emerging markets. On the other hand, some players simply have a global strategy.

What do you see as being the biggest legal challenges for European wind?

To be honest, I must say that we’ve overcome a lot of the challenges. Now the main regulatory issues are problems of grid congestion and environmental permitting.

In my view, few countries so far provide a viable regulatory framework to finally break-through on storage technologies or power-to-X solutions. To improve this would be important in order to allow for a faster and efficient build-out.

The step from subsidised to purely marketed electricity production is large from a financing perspective. We are still experimenting with that. It is more common in Scandinavia and the UK than it is in Germany, so PPAs with volatile electricity are still something we are learning how to address properly, both economically and contractually.

On the other hand, everybody always talks about the PPA market as though it was a new thing – but we have known and worked with PPAs for decades. There still are many parallels to the days of nuclear and fossil power plants. So that is no revolution from my perspective – at least in the legal sense, it is not as complicated as many people claim. Economically, one may take a different view, in particular considering the range of electricity price forecasts.

What do you think the next ten years will look like for wind in Germany?

The government is planning to auction an additional 4GW of onshore wind capacity so that is good news. Also, the prices have increased in the last auction. Overall, I think onshore wind might over this period become the cheapest electricity we have, especially with further scaling.

Right now, offshore wind is a bit problematic because our grid enhancements and expansions have not kept pace. But I think with more technology coming to the market, that helps to balance the grids and some infrastructure measures – this natural boundary to offshore wind – will fall. We will see more capacity being realised than most people expect at this point.

And finally, what do you think the impact of Brexit will be for wind in the UK?

The fundamental logic of power production will stay the same. But I do not know what the impact might be on the political agenda of the UK.

It is possible there will be less foreign investors willing or able to invest in the UK. But that will not be a problem as long as there is so much capital in the market. If at any point in time we see a general downturn with less money in the market, then it could hit the UK harder as investors would have to diversify their portfolios.

Want to hear more from Felix? He'll speaking at Financing Wind Europe conference on 1st November, where Chatham Partners is an official supporting organisation. Book your place.

Full archive access is available to members only

Not a member yet?

Become a member of the 6,500-strong A Word About Wind community today, and gain access to our premium content, exclusive lead generation and investment opportunities.

Full archive access is available to members only

Not a member yet?

Become a member of the 6,500-strong A Word About Wind community today, and gain access to our premium content, exclusive lead generation and investment opportunities.