Monday 14th April 2014

Topics
No items found.
Adam Barber
April 14, 2014
This content is from our archive. Some formatting or links may be broken.
This content is from our archive. Some formatting or links may be broken.
Monday 14th April 2014

E.On deserts Sahara green scheme

E.On and HSH Nordbank are pulling out of a major scheme to develop wind and solar projects in Africa's Sahara desert.

The German utility plans to leave the Desertec Industrial Initiative (DII) consortium when its contract expires this year to focus on its own projects. The German bank has also confirmed it is leaving.

DII was launched in 2009 to develop wind and solar projects in the Sahara and import the energy to Europe. Siemens and Bosch left the consortium in 2012. The DII group now includes firms including ABB, Deutsche Bank, Munich Re, RWE and Shell.

970MW Navitus application submitted

Eneco and EDF Energy have submitted the planning application for their 970MW Navitus Bay wind farm off the UK south coast.

The £3.5bn wind farm is set to be located in the Solent, between Dorset and the Isle of Wight. The developers have submitted an application to the Planning Inspectorate, and are planning to start construction on the site in 2017.

In February, the partners reduced the scheme from 1.1GW to 970MW and moved it 3.8km further from the Dorset coast.

Ikea buys 98MW Hoopeston scheme

Ikea has bought the 98MW Hoopeston wind farm in Illinois, which it says will generate enough electricity to cover its US energy use.

The Swedish furniture retailer has bought the project, which is due to complete in 2015, from US developer Apex Clean Energy for an undisclosed sum. Apex Clean will continue to develop the wind farm and operate it after construction.

This is Ikea’s first wind farm investment in the US and its largest renewable energy investment to date.

Australia to miss 2020 target by 40%

Renewable energy policy rollbacks in Australia will harm the wind sector and mean the country fails to hit long-standing renewable energy targets, according to new research.

Energy consultancy RepuTex said government plans to repeal the carbon price mechanism and cut its renewable energy target mean that renewable energy sources totalling only 24.6GW would be built by 2020, which is 40% below the existing target of 41GW.

This would lead to a significant reduction in new onshore wind plans. Further details on the policy changes are due this month.

US wind installations drop 92% in 2013

Developers completed US wind farms totalling just 1.1GW in 2013, which is a 92% drop from a record level of 13.1GW in 2012.

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has reported the drop in its latest annual survey. It said that uncertainty about the federal production tax credit (PTC) had caused the slowdown, and called for more policy certainty over the future of the PTC.

AWEA added that 100 projects totalling 12GW were being built in the US at the end of 2013. The US has total capacity of 61GW.

Wind Watch
by Richard Heap

Listen to critics of wind farms and you’ll often hear how these projects kill the countryside, increase blackouts and damage health. Sadly, there isn’t space here to de-bunk all of these.

But there is one common criticism worthy of further scrutiny. This is the idea that building more wind farms is stupid because they’re only useful when the wind is blowing. This isn't the case.

Last week, the UK’s Royal Academy of Engineering released a study on how the UK grid has to change by 2030 to accommodate more wind farms. The ideas in this report will also be of interest for other countries grappling with the same challenge.

So let's look at its findings in more detail.

The UK’s big challenge is its demand-led grid, which means that energy sources must be generating enough energy when people need it. Sadly, the wind doesn't always blow when required and, as more wind farms are built, this could cause supply problems.

However, this can be managed using daily wind farm output forecasts. These are reliable, although not 100% accurate.

There is also the problem of wind farms generating too much energy when it isn’t needed, and so the government has to pay them to shut off. Cue angry comments about these "constraint payments" on online chat threads, conveniently ignoring how traditional power producers also get such payments.

Wind farm critics think these are killer blows, but they aren’t.

The academy’s study says the UK grid is able to cope with both of these issues until 2020; and that it can be adapted to cope with this by 2030 and beyond. This takes into account the potential for increased energy demand from, for example, electric vehicles.

Its proposals to adapt the grid fall into three categories: storage, demand management and interconnection.

The first of these ideas is that the grid needs more energy storage capacity. This means that, when wind farms are generating too much power, the excess can be stored in large battery-like systems and used when needed at a later date. Low wind periods only tend to last a few days in the UK, and such a system would help cope during these times.

The second idea - demand management - looks at cutting domestic energy demand when there isn’t enough supply. For example, household appliances can be fitted with chips that enable the electricity grid to tell them to reduce their energy consumption at busy times. This would be part of a “smart” grid, or a system that some IT firms call the “internet of things”.

And the third idea - interconnection - proposes linking the UK grid to others overseas. This means the UK could export energy when it is producing too much, and import when it isn’t producing enough. The European Union is currently looking at plans along these lines as it considers policies to support an EU super-grid.

These are all vital changes that can future proof the grid and help to cope with growing numbers of wind farms.

Of course, much of this technology is untested at such a large scale, and making these changes would need funding, long-term political backing; and time to find the right blend of solutions. But it can be done if we re-think what a grid is and what it does.

It is also helpful that this study is written by a group with little interest in talking up the wind industry. In theory, this means that its ideas should carry more weight with wind farm critics.

Still, good luck getting those critics to listen.

E.On deserts Sahara green scheme

E.On and HSH Nordbank are pulling out of a major scheme to develop wind and solar projects in Africa's Sahara desert.

The German utility plans to leave the Desertec Industrial Initiative (DII) consortium when its contract expires this year to focus on its own projects. The German bank has also confirmed it is leaving.

DII was launched in 2009 to develop wind and solar projects in the Sahara and import the energy to Europe. Siemens and Bosch left the consortium in 2012. The DII group now includes firms including ABB, Deutsche Bank, Munich Re, RWE and Shell.

970MW Navitus application submitted

Eneco and EDF Energy have submitted the planning application for their 970MW Navitus Bay wind farm off the UK south coast.

The £3.5bn wind farm is set to be located in the Solent, between Dorset and the Isle of Wight. The developers have submitted an application to the Planning Inspectorate, and are planning to start construction on the site in 2017.

In February, the partners reduced the scheme from 1.1GW to 970MW and moved it 3.8km further from the Dorset coast.

Ikea buys 98MW Hoopeston scheme

Ikea has bought the 98MW Hoopeston wind farm in Illinois, which it says will generate enough electricity to cover its US energy use.

The Swedish furniture retailer has bought the project, which is due to complete in 2015, from US developer Apex Clean Energy for an undisclosed sum. Apex Clean will continue to develop the wind farm and operate it after construction.

This is Ikea’s first wind farm investment in the US and its largest renewable energy investment to date.

Australia to miss 2020 target by 40%

Renewable energy policy rollbacks in Australia will harm the wind sector and mean the country fails to hit long-standing renewable energy targets, according to new research.

Energy consultancy RepuTex said government plans to repeal the carbon price mechanism and cut its renewable energy target mean that renewable energy sources totalling only 24.6GW would be built by 2020, which is 40% below the existing target of 41GW.

This would lead to a significant reduction in new onshore wind plans. Further details on the policy changes are due this month.

US wind installations drop 92% in 2013

Developers completed US wind farms totalling just 1.1GW in 2013, which is a 92% drop from a record level of 13.1GW in 2012.

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has reported the drop in its latest annual survey. It said that uncertainty about the federal production tax credit (PTC) had caused the slowdown, and called for more policy certainty over the future of the PTC.

AWEA added that 100 projects totalling 12GW were being built in the US at the end of 2013. The US has total capacity of 61GW.

Wind Watch
by Richard Heap

Listen to critics of wind farms and you’ll often hear how these projects kill the countryside, increase blackouts and damage health. Sadly, there isn’t space here to de-bunk all of these.

But there is one common criticism worthy of further scrutiny. This is the idea that building more wind farms is stupid because they’re only useful when the wind is blowing. This isn't the case.

Last week, the UK’s Royal Academy of Engineering released a study on how the UK grid has to change by 2030 to accommodate more wind farms. The ideas in this report will also be of interest for other countries grappling with the same challenge.

So let's look at its findings in more detail.

The UK’s big challenge is its demand-led grid, which means that energy sources must be generating enough energy when people need it. Sadly, the wind doesn't always blow when required and, as more wind farms are built, this could cause supply problems.

However, this can be managed using daily wind farm output forecasts. These are reliable, although not 100% accurate.

There is also the problem of wind farms generating too much energy when it isn’t needed, and so the government has to pay them to shut off. Cue angry comments about these "constraint payments" on online chat threads, conveniently ignoring how traditional power producers also get such payments.

Wind farm critics think these are killer blows, but they aren’t.

The academy’s study says the UK grid is able to cope with both of these issues until 2020; and that it can be adapted to cope with this by 2030 and beyond. This takes into account the potential for increased energy demand from, for example, electric vehicles.

Its proposals to adapt the grid fall into three categories: storage, demand management and interconnection.

The first of these ideas is that the grid needs more energy storage capacity. This means that, when wind farms are generating too much power, the excess can be stored in large battery-like systems and used when needed at a later date. Low wind periods only tend to last a few days in the UK, and such a system would help cope during these times.

The second idea - demand management - looks at cutting domestic energy demand when there isn’t enough supply. For example, household appliances can be fitted with chips that enable the electricity grid to tell them to reduce their energy consumption at busy times. This would be part of a “smart” grid, or a system that some IT firms call the “internet of things”.

And the third idea - interconnection - proposes linking the UK grid to others overseas. This means the UK could export energy when it is producing too much, and import when it isn’t producing enough. The European Union is currently looking at plans along these lines as it considers policies to support an EU super-grid.

These are all vital changes that can future proof the grid and help to cope with growing numbers of wind farms.

Of course, much of this technology is untested at such a large scale, and making these changes would need funding, long-term political backing; and time to find the right blend of solutions. But it can be done if we re-think what a grid is and what it does.

It is also helpful that this study is written by a group with little interest in talking up the wind industry. In theory, this means that its ideas should carry more weight with wind farm critics.

Still, good luck getting those critics to listen.

E.On deserts Sahara green scheme

E.On and HSH Nordbank are pulling out of a major scheme to develop wind and solar projects in Africa's Sahara desert.

The German utility plans to leave the Desertec Industrial Initiative (DII) consortium when its contract expires this year to focus on its own projects. The German bank has also confirmed it is leaving.

DII was launched in 2009 to develop wind and solar projects in the Sahara and import the energy to Europe. Siemens and Bosch left the consortium in 2012. The DII group now includes firms including ABB, Deutsche Bank, Munich Re, RWE and Shell.

970MW Navitus application submitted

Eneco and EDF Energy have submitted the planning application for their 970MW Navitus Bay wind farm off the UK south coast.

The £3.5bn wind farm is set to be located in the Solent, between Dorset and the Isle of Wight. The developers have submitted an application to the Planning Inspectorate, and are planning to start construction on the site in 2017.

In February, the partners reduced the scheme from 1.1GW to 970MW and moved it 3.8km further from the Dorset coast.

Ikea buys 98MW Hoopeston scheme

Ikea has bought the 98MW Hoopeston wind farm in Illinois, which it says will generate enough electricity to cover its US energy use.

The Swedish furniture retailer has bought the project, which is due to complete in 2015, from US developer Apex Clean Energy for an undisclosed sum. Apex Clean will continue to develop the wind farm and operate it after construction.

This is Ikea’s first wind farm investment in the US and its largest renewable energy investment to date.

Australia to miss 2020 target by 40%

Renewable energy policy rollbacks in Australia will harm the wind sector and mean the country fails to hit long-standing renewable energy targets, according to new research.

Energy consultancy RepuTex said government plans to repeal the carbon price mechanism and cut its renewable energy target mean that renewable energy sources totalling only 24.6GW would be built by 2020, which is 40% below the existing target of 41GW.

This would lead to a significant reduction in new onshore wind plans. Further details on the policy changes are due this month.

US wind installations drop 92% in 2013

Developers completed US wind farms totalling just 1.1GW in 2013, which is a 92% drop from a record level of 13.1GW in 2012.

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has reported the drop in its latest annual survey. It said that uncertainty about the federal production tax credit (PTC) had caused the slowdown, and called for more policy certainty over the future of the PTC.

AWEA added that 100 projects totalling 12GW were being built in the US at the end of 2013. The US has total capacity of 61GW.

Wind Watch
by Richard Heap

Listen to critics of wind farms and you’ll often hear how these projects kill the countryside, increase blackouts and damage health. Sadly, there isn’t space here to de-bunk all of these.

But there is one common criticism worthy of further scrutiny. This is the idea that building more wind farms is stupid because they’re only useful when the wind is blowing. This isn't the case.

Last week, the UK’s Royal Academy of Engineering released a study on how the UK grid has to change by 2030 to accommodate more wind farms. The ideas in this report will also be of interest for other countries grappling with the same challenge.

So let's look at its findings in more detail.

The UK’s big challenge is its demand-led grid, which means that energy sources must be generating enough energy when people need it. Sadly, the wind doesn't always blow when required and, as more wind farms are built, this could cause supply problems.

However, this can be managed using daily wind farm output forecasts. These are reliable, although not 100% accurate.

There is also the problem of wind farms generating too much energy when it isn’t needed, and so the government has to pay them to shut off. Cue angry comments about these "constraint payments" on online chat threads, conveniently ignoring how traditional power producers also get such payments.

Wind farm critics think these are killer blows, but they aren’t.

The academy’s study says the UK grid is able to cope with both of these issues until 2020; and that it can be adapted to cope with this by 2030 and beyond. This takes into account the potential for increased energy demand from, for example, electric vehicles.

Its proposals to adapt the grid fall into three categories: storage, demand management and interconnection.

The first of these ideas is that the grid needs more energy storage capacity. This means that, when wind farms are generating too much power, the excess can be stored in large battery-like systems and used when needed at a later date. Low wind periods only tend to last a few days in the UK, and such a system would help cope during these times.

The second idea - demand management - looks at cutting domestic energy demand when there isn’t enough supply. For example, household appliances can be fitted with chips that enable the electricity grid to tell them to reduce their energy consumption at busy times. This would be part of a “smart” grid, or a system that some IT firms call the “internet of things”.

And the third idea - interconnection - proposes linking the UK grid to others overseas. This means the UK could export energy when it is producing too much, and import when it isn’t producing enough. The European Union is currently looking at plans along these lines as it considers policies to support an EU super-grid.

These are all vital changes that can future proof the grid and help to cope with growing numbers of wind farms.

Of course, much of this technology is untested at such a large scale, and making these changes would need funding, long-term political backing; and time to find the right blend of solutions. But it can be done if we re-think what a grid is and what it does.

It is also helpful that this study is written by a group with little interest in talking up the wind industry. In theory, this means that its ideas should carry more weight with wind farm critics.

Still, good luck getting those critics to listen.

E.On deserts Sahara green scheme

E.On and HSH Nordbank are pulling out of a major scheme to develop wind and solar projects in Africa's Sahara desert.

The German utility plans to leave the Desertec Industrial Initiative (DII) consortium when its contract expires this year to focus on its own projects. The German bank has also confirmed it is leaving.

DII was launched in 2009 to develop wind and solar projects in the Sahara and import the energy to Europe. Siemens and Bosch left the consortium in 2012. The DII group now includes firms including ABB, Deutsche Bank, Munich Re, RWE and Shell.

970MW Navitus application submitted

Eneco and EDF Energy have submitted the planning application for their 970MW Navitus Bay wind farm off the UK south coast.

The £3.5bn wind farm is set to be located in the Solent, between Dorset and the Isle of Wight. The developers have submitted an application to the Planning Inspectorate, and are planning to start construction on the site in 2017.

In February, the partners reduced the scheme from 1.1GW to 970MW and moved it 3.8km further from the Dorset coast.

Ikea buys 98MW Hoopeston scheme

Ikea has bought the 98MW Hoopeston wind farm in Illinois, which it says will generate enough electricity to cover its US energy use.

The Swedish furniture retailer has bought the project, which is due to complete in 2015, from US developer Apex Clean Energy for an undisclosed sum. Apex Clean will continue to develop the wind farm and operate it after construction.

This is Ikea’s first wind farm investment in the US and its largest renewable energy investment to date.

Australia to miss 2020 target by 40%

Renewable energy policy rollbacks in Australia will harm the wind sector and mean the country fails to hit long-standing renewable energy targets, according to new research.

Energy consultancy RepuTex said government plans to repeal the carbon price mechanism and cut its renewable energy target mean that renewable energy sources totalling only 24.6GW would be built by 2020, which is 40% below the existing target of 41GW.

This would lead to a significant reduction in new onshore wind plans. Further details on the policy changes are due this month.

US wind installations drop 92% in 2013

Developers completed US wind farms totalling just 1.1GW in 2013, which is a 92% drop from a record level of 13.1GW in 2012.

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has reported the drop in its latest annual survey. It said that uncertainty about the federal production tax credit (PTC) had caused the slowdown, and called for more policy certainty over the future of the PTC.

AWEA added that 100 projects totalling 12GW were being built in the US at the end of 2013. The US has total capacity of 61GW.

Wind Watch
by Richard Heap

Listen to critics of wind farms and you’ll often hear how these projects kill the countryside, increase blackouts and damage health. Sadly, there isn’t space here to de-bunk all of these.

But there is one common criticism worthy of further scrutiny. This is the idea that building more wind farms is stupid because they’re only useful when the wind is blowing. This isn't the case.

Last week, the UK’s Royal Academy of Engineering released a study on how the UK grid has to change by 2030 to accommodate more wind farms. The ideas in this report will also be of interest for other countries grappling with the same challenge.

So let's look at its findings in more detail.

The UK’s big challenge is its demand-led grid, which means that energy sources must be generating enough energy when people need it. Sadly, the wind doesn't always blow when required and, as more wind farms are built, this could cause supply problems.

However, this can be managed using daily wind farm output forecasts. These are reliable, although not 100% accurate.

There is also the problem of wind farms generating too much energy when it isn’t needed, and so the government has to pay them to shut off. Cue angry comments about these "constraint payments" on online chat threads, conveniently ignoring how traditional power producers also get such payments.

Wind farm critics think these are killer blows, but they aren’t.

The academy’s study says the UK grid is able to cope with both of these issues until 2020; and that it can be adapted to cope with this by 2030 and beyond. This takes into account the potential for increased energy demand from, for example, electric vehicles.

Its proposals to adapt the grid fall into three categories: storage, demand management and interconnection.

The first of these ideas is that the grid needs more energy storage capacity. This means that, when wind farms are generating too much power, the excess can be stored in large battery-like systems and used when needed at a later date. Low wind periods only tend to last a few days in the UK, and such a system would help cope during these times.

The second idea - demand management - looks at cutting domestic energy demand when there isn’t enough supply. For example, household appliances can be fitted with chips that enable the electricity grid to tell them to reduce their energy consumption at busy times. This would be part of a “smart” grid, or a system that some IT firms call the “internet of things”.

And the third idea - interconnection - proposes linking the UK grid to others overseas. This means the UK could export energy when it is producing too much, and import when it isn’t producing enough. The European Union is currently looking at plans along these lines as it considers policies to support an EU super-grid.

These are all vital changes that can future proof the grid and help to cope with growing numbers of wind farms.

Of course, much of this technology is untested at such a large scale, and making these changes would need funding, long-term political backing; and time to find the right blend of solutions. But it can be done if we re-think what a grid is and what it does.

It is also helpful that this study is written by a group with little interest in talking up the wind industry. In theory, this means that its ideas should carry more weight with wind farm critics.

Still, good luck getting those critics to listen.

E.On deserts Sahara green scheme

E.On and HSH Nordbank are pulling out of a major scheme to develop wind and solar projects in Africa's Sahara desert.

The German utility plans to leave the Desertec Industrial Initiative (DII) consortium when its contract expires this year to focus on its own projects. The German bank has also confirmed it is leaving.

DII was launched in 2009 to develop wind and solar projects in the Sahara and import the energy to Europe. Siemens and Bosch left the consortium in 2012. The DII group now includes firms including ABB, Deutsche Bank, Munich Re, RWE and Shell.

970MW Navitus application submitted

Eneco and EDF Energy have submitted the planning application for their 970MW Navitus Bay wind farm off the UK south coast.

The £3.5bn wind farm is set to be located in the Solent, between Dorset and the Isle of Wight. The developers have submitted an application to the Planning Inspectorate, and are planning to start construction on the site in 2017.

In February, the partners reduced the scheme from 1.1GW to 970MW and moved it 3.8km further from the Dorset coast.

Ikea buys 98MW Hoopeston scheme

Ikea has bought the 98MW Hoopeston wind farm in Illinois, which it says will generate enough electricity to cover its US energy use.

The Swedish furniture retailer has bought the project, which is due to complete in 2015, from US developer Apex Clean Energy for an undisclosed sum. Apex Clean will continue to develop the wind farm and operate it after construction.

This is Ikea’s first wind farm investment in the US and its largest renewable energy investment to date.

Australia to miss 2020 target by 40%

Renewable energy policy rollbacks in Australia will harm the wind sector and mean the country fails to hit long-standing renewable energy targets, according to new research.

Energy consultancy RepuTex said government plans to repeal the carbon price mechanism and cut its renewable energy target mean that renewable energy sources totalling only 24.6GW would be built by 2020, which is 40% below the existing target of 41GW.

This would lead to a significant reduction in new onshore wind plans. Further details on the policy changes are due this month.

US wind installations drop 92% in 2013

Developers completed US wind farms totalling just 1.1GW in 2013, which is a 92% drop from a record level of 13.1GW in 2012.

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has reported the drop in its latest annual survey. It said that uncertainty about the federal production tax credit (PTC) had caused the slowdown, and called for more policy certainty over the future of the PTC.

AWEA added that 100 projects totalling 12GW were being built in the US at the end of 2013. The US has total capacity of 61GW.

Wind Watch
by Richard Heap

Listen to critics of wind farms and you’ll often hear how these projects kill the countryside, increase blackouts and damage health. Sadly, there isn’t space here to de-bunk all of these.

But there is one common criticism worthy of further scrutiny. This is the idea that building more wind farms is stupid because they’re only useful when the wind is blowing. This isn't the case.

Last week, the UK’s Royal Academy of Engineering released a study on how the UK grid has to change by 2030 to accommodate more wind farms. The ideas in this report will also be of interest for other countries grappling with the same challenge.

So let's look at its findings in more detail.

The UK’s big challenge is its demand-led grid, which means that energy sources must be generating enough energy when people need it. Sadly, the wind doesn't always blow when required and, as more wind farms are built, this could cause supply problems.

However, this can be managed using daily wind farm output forecasts. These are reliable, although not 100% accurate.

There is also the problem of wind farms generating too much energy when it isn’t needed, and so the government has to pay them to shut off. Cue angry comments about these "constraint payments" on online chat threads, conveniently ignoring how traditional power producers also get such payments.

Wind farm critics think these are killer blows, but they aren’t.

The academy’s study says the UK grid is able to cope with both of these issues until 2020; and that it can be adapted to cope with this by 2030 and beyond. This takes into account the potential for increased energy demand from, for example, electric vehicles.

Its proposals to adapt the grid fall into three categories: storage, demand management and interconnection.

The first of these ideas is that the grid needs more energy storage capacity. This means that, when wind farms are generating too much power, the excess can be stored in large battery-like systems and used when needed at a later date. Low wind periods only tend to last a few days in the UK, and such a system would help cope during these times.

The second idea - demand management - looks at cutting domestic energy demand when there isn’t enough supply. For example, household appliances can be fitted with chips that enable the electricity grid to tell them to reduce their energy consumption at busy times. This would be part of a “smart” grid, or a system that some IT firms call the “internet of things”.

And the third idea - interconnection - proposes linking the UK grid to others overseas. This means the UK could export energy when it is producing too much, and import when it isn’t producing enough. The European Union is currently looking at plans along these lines as it considers policies to support an EU super-grid.

These are all vital changes that can future proof the grid and help to cope with growing numbers of wind farms.

Of course, much of this technology is untested at such a large scale, and making these changes would need funding, long-term political backing; and time to find the right blend of solutions. But it can be done if we re-think what a grid is and what it does.

It is also helpful that this study is written by a group with little interest in talking up the wind industry. In theory, this means that its ideas should carry more weight with wind farm critics.

Still, good luck getting those critics to listen.

Full archive access is available to members only

Not a member yet?

Become a member of the 6,500-strong A Word About Wind community today, and gain access to our premium content, exclusive lead generation and investment opportunities.

Full archive access is available to members only

Not a member yet?

Become a member of the 6,500-strong A Word About Wind community today, and gain access to our premium content, exclusive lead generation and investment opportunities.